NOMINATION OF TRACY STONE-MANNING (Executive Calendar)
Congressional Record Vol. 167, No. 131
(Senate - July 27, 2021) PDF
Mrs. HYDE-SMITH. Madam President, I rise to join my colleagues in
expressing my grave concern over the nomination of Ms. Tracy Stone-
Manning to be the Director of the Bureau of Land Management.
The Office of the Director of the Bureau of Land Management is tasked
with an enormous responsibility. As it manages an eighth of our
Nation's land, its leadership should be held to the highest standards.
Every nominee referred to the Energy and Natural Resources Committee
must complete and submit the statement for completion by Presidential
nominees, which is the standard committee questionnaire. In the sworn
statement, Ms. Stone-Manning told the committee that she has never been
arrested or charged and, to her knowledge, has never been the target of
an investigation.
Unfortunately, as many of us are now aware, Ms. Stone-Manning's
responses were not forthcoming nor fully accurate.
I am particularly disturbed by Ms. Stone-Manning's involvement with
the ecoterrorist organization Earth First!, which organized the tree-
spiking plot in Idaho. As you all may know, tree spiking involves
hammering a metal or ceramic rod into a tree trunk in order to prevent
loggers from harvesting the timber. If the saw makes contact with a
spike, it can result in severe injury or even the logger's death.
Make no mistake, the people who put these spikes into the trees are
well aware of the potential consequences of their actions. These
schemes are carried out with intent to harm or even, at the very least,
the intent to frighten the loggers who are carrying out their daily
jobs.
I want to be clear, no one is claiming that Ms. Stone-Manning put any
spikes in any trees herself. However, it is undisputed that Ms. Stone-
Manning assisted the people who did.
Ms. Stone-Manning wrote a letter laced with vulgarities to the U.S.
Forest Service, threatening loggers who were simply carrying out their
jobs, doing what they do for a living.
In the aftermath of this tree-spiking conspiracy, Ms. Stone-Manning
was investigated and subpoenaed by a Federal grand jury. Ms. Stone-
Manning was silent about her involvement in the plot, but when new
evidence came to light 4 years later, she struck a deal for immunity in
1993.
Tracy Stone-Manning's involvement in ecoterrorism as well as her
dishonesty to the Senate is more than alarming. There are questions
that need to be revisited and answered. The statements from the former
lead investigator of the Idaho tree-spiking scheme as well as the
actions of the Federal grand jury tell a different tale than what Ms.
Stone-Manning led the committee to believe. These discrepancies must
not be cast aside.
I am concerned about the precedent that will be set for future
nominees if my colleagues simply agree to accept or disregard these
inconsistencies.
I am very disappointed that my Democratic colleagues on the Energy
Committee moved forward with Ms. Stone-Manning's nomination. There are
serious unanswered questions about her voracity and her qualifications
to lead.
I applaud my colleagues who have sought the truth, and I am
disheartened that those efforts have met with resistance. The American
people deserve transparency. I cannot support this nominee, and I would
urge my colleagues to do the same.
Thank you, Madam President.